There was some coverage of Open Notebook Science and Steve Koch and I were quoted. Ironically my contribution appeared in the "Cons" section :)
In my opinion, one of the biggest "Pros" wasn't listed in that section: the free cost. (That was mentioned elsewhere though) When you see the costs of some of these other commercial systems, that has to be a factor for many people trying to make a decision.Pros
- The format is unconstrained—you can set up any categories, and as many users and pages, as you want—and fast to set up.
- Open notebooking attracts collaborators. Koch counts three collaborations that wouldn’t have happened if he weren’t on OpenWetWare. And his students build professional networks well before they author a paper.
Cons
- Wikis were not designed with scientific data in mind. For example, it’s hard to make a table, Koch says.
- Open notebook science “does limit where you can send your work,” says Jean-Claude Bradley, a chemist at Drexel University in Philadelphia, who also uses an open wiki notebook. His lab sticks to journals that accept preprints.
- Posting online voids international patent rights, although US patents are still possible.
If privacy is an issue wikis can certainly be made private, although I'm not sure if that is possible on OpenWetWare. It can be done for $5/month on Wikispaces, the wiki we use for lab notebooks - although then it wouldn't be Open Notebook Science.
Concerning Steve's Con of wikis being difficult to use to store data, that is true. However combining the use of a wiki with Google Spreadsheets has completely resolved that issue for us. With our ability to automatically export an archive of the notebook (as HTML) and spreadsheets (as XLS) into an integrated archive, the two platforms operate essentially as if they were a single system.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI’m an attorney at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. In 2009 we launched the Online Media Legal Network (OMLN), a free legal referral network that helps independent journalists and online publishers find free legal help. The network provides assistance in a broad range of legal issues, including pre-publication review of content, copyright counseling and licensing, freelancer agreements, and representation in litigation.
We’re reaching out to the community of science journalists and scientists who blog about their work or comment upon science coverage in the news media. Our services are completely free, but we do have some limitations on who we can help. If you would like to learn more about our project, I encourage you to visit our website at http://www.omln.org or email me directly.
Please also feel free to spread the word about OMLN and to fellow scientists and science journalists!
Thanks Helen! It sounds like a great service
ReplyDelete